sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jonathan Evraire <evraire AT tuwg.com>
- To: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org, <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] a question on z-rejected
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:22:17 +0000 (UTC)
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Eric Schabell wrote:
> I am now going thru the grimoire and making a list... we need to try and get
> rid of the gcc2 setup... I think all spells with gcc2 should be dropped if
> possible, or moved to z-rejected.... and gcc2 spell can also go to
> z-rejected.
As I recall, most of what's in z-rejected either has an incompatible
licence with SMGL, or is binary. And from what I understand of things to
come, the binary stuff in z-rejected is going to be moved to a seperate
grimoire eventually called "binary" or something like that. Would gcc2
spells then get moved to a seperate grimoire called "gcc2"? If so, I
think we should make an effort to seperate them now by creating another
section in the grimoire (z-rejected-gcc2 ?) so moving them to a seperate
grimoire at a later date would be that much easier. (Then again, I don't
know how easy it is to add a section to the grimoire. :)
Thoughts?
Jonathan Evraire
evraire at tuwg.com
-
[SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Julian v. Bock, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- [SM-Discuss] a question on z-rejected, Jonathan Evraire, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Tony Smith, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- RE: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Reapl Paratorn, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Adam Clark, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Julian v. Bock, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 10/11/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.