sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:21:07 +0200
Hi
>>>>> "AvM" == Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net> writes:
AvM> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:03:28PM +0200, Eric Schabell wrote:
>> Howdy all!
>>
>> Just a note to see what the official line is, but we are going to
>> have a gcc3.2 compatible grimoire right? No gcc2 spells?
AvM> There seem to still be a lot of spells in the devel grimoire with
AvM> USEGCC2 files, so that could be a problem. How about removing
AvM> the dependency on gcc2 in gcc and just have all spells that need
AvM> gcc2 to compile have a dependency on it? That way the system
AvM> would be gcc3, only if someone needs a spell that will only
AvM> compile with gcc2 it will be installed.
This should work since ncurses does not need gcc2 anymore.
We should double-check the base system though.
Julian
-
[SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Julian v. Bock, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- [SM-Discuss] a question on z-rejected, Jonathan Evraire, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Tony Smith, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- RE: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Reapl Paratorn, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Adam Clark, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Julian v. Bock, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 10/11/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.