nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio
List archive
- From: "Mark Angermayer" <hangermayer@isp.com>
- To: "North American Fruit Explorers" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Weather
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:14:25 -0600
I have a few layman's questions about global
warming (if someone's interested enough to take a shot at them) and a
comment that I hope is not too controversial.
Questions:
1. I've read that the natural underground coal
fires produce more atmospheric carbon annually than all humans combined. I
read this from a book that didn't seem to have a statement to make, just
reporting facts. Can anybody substantiate this?
2. Won't the global warming cause
increased vegetation because of increased CO2 (plant food) and increased
temperatures? Will this increased vegetation cause increased soil
carbon? My understanding is soil has an incredible capacity to hold
carbon. Is this correct? Will this have a minimizing affect on
global warming?
3. Has anyone considered how much carbon we
pack into landfills, and will this have any significant affect on carbon
taken out of the atmosphere (and placed in the landfills)? I've been
to a landfill for this area (KC), and I was amazed at what I saw. I
kid you not, there were trash trucks lined up for a quarter mile, moving right
along, and just as many coming out. The dump had an army of heavy
equipment all running, all at the same time, covering trash, moving dirt,
digging more space. The sheer volume they were burying was
incredible. Assuming cities around the world are all doing this, will this
have any affect on reducing global warming?
4. Would a little global warming be
detrimental, or could it be beneficial? Stephen mentioned extinctions are up, but is this due to global warming,
or due to continued human encroachment and habitat destruction? My
impression is that when it was warmer (when the dinosaurs roamed) the earth
supported more vegetation, which in a certain sense might seem
favorable? Is this correct?
Now for the comment:
So far I'm not fond of the approach that we (the
U.S.) aggressively reduce carbon emissions, while China brings online one
multi-mega coal fired power plant per week. I don't buy the idea that
since we are more prosperous, we can sacrifice more. For the last
generation, our prosperity has been borrowed. Our national debt is 11
tril. and is set to double over the next decade. (Both parties are to
blame.) I believe the interest alone on the national debt now exceeds 25%
of the annual federal budget. If the debt doubles in the next decade, we
will owe about $60k for every man, woman, child, or $240,000 for a family of
four. Paying that back will put more than a dent in our standard of
living.
Mark
KS
|
-
[NAFEX] Weather,
Ernest Plutko, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Steve, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Kevin Moore, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
John Barbowski, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Stephen Sadler, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Kevin Moore, 03/28/2009
- Re: [NAFEX] Weather, Betty Mayfield, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Kevin Moore, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Dr.O'Barr, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Mark Angermayer, 03/29/2009
- Re: [NAFEX] Weather, Kevin Moore, 03/29/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Mark Angermayer, 03/29/2009
- Re: [NAFEX] Weather, William C. Garthright, 03/29/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Stephen Sadler, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Steve, 03/29/2009
- Re: [NAFEX] Weather, Stephen Sadler, 03/29/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
John Barbowski, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Kevin Moore, 03/28/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[NAFEX] weather,
Tim Inman, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] weather,
Mark Dorogi, 03/28/2009
-
[NAFEX] weather to economics, OT,
Kieran &/or Donna, 03/28/2009
- Re: [NAFEX] weather to economics, OT, Naomi Counides, 03/28/2009
-
[NAFEX] weather to economics, OT,
Kieran &/or Donna, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] weather,
Mark Dorogi, 03/28/2009
-
Re: [NAFEX] Weather,
Steve, 03/28/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.