Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - Re: [Livingontheland] those $1,000 permaculture certificates...

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "TradingPostPaul" <tradingpost@riseup.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] those $1,000 permaculture certificates...
  • Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:39:17 -0700


Well, Mike, I'm having trouble locating where you differ from what I
actually wrote. Laura said the books she found lacked details, and I
referred to those books when I suggested "Could be those books are unclear
on details because they're not actually growing anything". Neither of us
mentioned Robert Hart; nor said he wasn't growing anything.

Toby Hemenway's (Gaia's Garden) own "permaculture" is nothing but his
(former) backyard garden. His claim of "permaculture" is an embarassment to
the total holistic vision of Holmgren and Mollison. He's the guy who wrote
about his contempt for rural life and rural people, who took his wife and
Mercedes back to the night life in the city. He doesn't walk the walk.
There are always phonies trying to cash in on the latest trend.

I wrote "It's a nice philosophy but in practice it's just not focused on
meeting the growing demand for food". And the way it's practiced - or not
practiced - in this country is not focused on meeting the growing demand
for food. I'm saying it isn't practiced by its apostles in this country.

You're right, there are places in many countries where they make
sustainable improvements in food growing and someone labels it
"permaculture". Problem is, there's nothing new in "permaculture" except
the word itself. In tree farming, Hart himself credited the earlier work of
James Sholto Douglas in southern Africa, a Japanese, Toyohiko Kagawa, J.
Russell Smith, Masanobu Fukuoka, and others. He refers to the extensive
forest farming in Kerala, India. http://www.ecobooks.com/books/forgard.htm
. Their traditional agriculture is subtropical, coastal and highly
productive, and they never heard of "permaculture". In fact, every
technique and practice claimed under the "permaculture" umbrella has been
used somewhere for ages and probably by indigenous peoples and
hunter-gatherers for millenia. The modern hubris of the West is largely
blind to the bountiful lives and agricultural advances of the indigenous in
many places throughout history. We think we invented everything - the
automobile, basketball, permaculture.

You mention that Permaculture courses HAVE solved hunger, social and
environment issues. Yes, but the actual practices that help those problems
in various countries have been around long before the word "permaculture"
was invented.

I'm not against forest gardening; it's just that it's been around forever.

You write:
>Permaculture shows that there are many successful ways of caring for the
>people, caring for the land, and sharing the surplus. Just because some
>of them don't fit into the way you like to do things, or the way you
>have seen things done, it doesn't invalidate any of them.

I'm curious where you saw me dissing the practices of "permaculture",
because I don't think I did. I just think it stinks for certain people to
claim they invented everything and call it "permaculture" and copyright the
word itself to try to cash in on everybody else's work than went before. I
sure don't need "permaculture" to know that there are many successful ways
of caring for the people, caring for the land, and sharing the surplus. All
things I've advocated tirelessly.

You stress that Permaculture is about increasing the OVERALL yield. But
didn't I just say "the urgent need is millions of families working toward
sustainable, healthy food production for home and market"? If you read any
of my past messages you see my concern with overall yield. It's my main
focal point in fact. Surely you won't claim that only permaculturists are
concerned with overall yield.

If there is something you differ on, please specify and we can discuss it.

paul tradingpost@lobo.net

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 3/6/2007 at 9:20 AM Mike E wrote:

>I do see it differently Paul. Robert Hart pioneered a method of
>gardening that is incredibly productive (in terms of land area and
>external inputs). The fact that harvesting is more labour intensive is
>only an issue for those who wish to mechanise the process. The visual
>result is messy for those that still have this "control of nature" thing
>embedded in their psyche.
>
>But in terms of overall yield, the forest garden cannot be beaten - in
>those areas of the world where the forest is the natural condition. If
>you live in an area that was originally a permaculture of grasslands,
>then you must establish its equivilent.
>
>Which is where the original vision of the Permaculture Design Course
>came from. Permaculture is about increasing the OVERALL yield. Not just
>the beans, or just the corn. One of your other posts pointed in this
>very direction - the three sisters. No-one would suggest that planting
>all three would give more of every plant than planting just that one
>plant. But the combined yield far exceeds that that would be possible if
>you separated that plants out into their own areas.
>
>The forest garden is just a more complex version of the three sisters.
>In a different part of the world with a different natural ecosystem.
>
>That it doesn't lend itself to industrial agricultural methods is a
>strength, not a weakness. And the future of America's food is not in the
>corporate control of it anyway. It is in everyone's backyard.
>
> >>Trendy, high-priced, feel-good seminars and fancy coffee table books
>do nothing to deal with what's happening in the real world.
>
>This comment contains no specific and is thus impossible to refute.
>Permaculture courses HAVE solved hunger, social and environment issues.
>And the perennial Permaculture books do contain information that has
>changed the fortunes of communities around the world. One single idea
>changed the balance of power and money (from concentrated to spread out)
>in an area of thousands of square miles in India.
>
>>>Could be those books are unclear on details because they're not actually
>growing anything
>
>Again, you are surely not referring to the books you mentioned in the
>first paragraph. Robert Hart probably does not grow to sell in a
>commercial environment, but I'd challenge you to show that he doesn't
>grow anything, or that he doesn't even supply a massive amount of
>incredibly varied food for the consumption by him and his family in an
>incredibly small area.
>
>Permaculture shows that there are many successful ways of caring for the
>people, caring for the land, and sharing the surplus. Just because some
>of them don't fit into the way you like to do things, or the way you
>have seen things done, it doesn't invalidate any of them.
>
>Mike
>
>
>TradingPostPaul wrote:
>> Others may see it differently, but my take on it is Gaia's Garden is
>> backyard hobby gardening, when the urgent need is millions of families
>> working toward sustainable, healthy food production for home and market.
>> It's a nice philosophy but in practice it's just not focused on meeting
>the
>> growing demand for food. The U.S. is now a net IMporter of food; we are
>NOT
>> the breadbasket to the world, and our irrigation water supplies are
>> dropping, the cost of fuel is rising, and much of the best farm soil is
>> severely depleted by decades of ignorance. The economic indicators all
>> point straight down. We are already in recession and the real price
>misery
>> for consumers is yet to come. All these things make us more vulnerable
to
>> the weaknesses of just-in-time supermarket distribution and supply.
>>
>> Trendy, high-priced, feel-good seminars and fancy coffee table books do
>> nothing to deal with what's happening in the real world. Could be those
>> books are unclear on details because they're not actually growing
>anything.
>> There are many down to earth, practical guides out there, and my time
and
>> energy is limited, so I have to focus on what I need to eat and sell
>> locally. I won't make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but
>at
>> least I won't be part of the problem.
>>
>> paul tradingpost@lobo.net
>>
>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>>
>> On 3/5/2007 at 11:11 AM Laura McKenzie wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Regarding Permaculture ideas, I found down to earth examples in "Gaia's

>>> Garden" helpful and liked "How to Make a Forest Garden" too. Though I
>used
>>>
>>
>>
>>> gift certificates to buy both, I'm now learning the joys of interloan
as
>>> our
>>> library has just started offering it. The library allows me to keep
>each
>>> book for 10 days so I have to read quickly.
>>>
>>> I'd like to read more about permaculture too but many of the books
>I've
>>> found are a bit unclear. They have concepts but not details! I need
>the
>>> details; I understand the concepts.
>>>
>>> Laura
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Livingontheland mailing list
>> Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Livingontheland mailing list
>Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page