internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?
- From: zman <zman AT shell.neverwhere.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:04:57 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, David Matusiak wrote:
Both seem to get the job
done, but Fusion allows you to install other operating systems (besides
Microsoft Windows).
So does Parallels. I currently have XP, RHEL, Fedora, and a few others for testing.
Scott H. Zekanis
zman AT kungfumonkey.com
Rod-O-Rama http://www.rod-o-rama.com
Vagabonds C.C. http://www.vagabonds.cc
'57 Buick Riviera, '60 International B100
'23 Buick Roadster, '38 Buick Coupe
-
[internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Susan LaBarre, 08/04/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?, Jim Ray, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Paul Cory, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
David Matusiak, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?, David Matusiak, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Susan LaBarre, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Paul Cory, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?, David Matusiak, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Roger Austin, 08/04/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?, david cherryholmes, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Paul Cory, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
David Matusiak, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Paul Cory, 08/04/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?, Tanner Lovelace, 08/04/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.