internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?
- From: "Jim Ray" <jim AT neuse.net>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:22:47 -0400
You pay big bucks for greatest performance. If you just have
money to burn, do it. Myself, well, I bought a 2 year old StinkPad from Amazon or
somewhere, love it and let someone else take the accounting hit on depreciable
assets. If I were buying new, I would pay for extra DRAM memory yet not
for extra processor speed or SRAM memory (cache). The primary bottleneck in
computer architecture is still the electromagnetic hard drive anyway. Now, if they have a solid state hard drive, you will directly
address that primary bottleneck… From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Susan
LaBarre Help. With the tax holiday
coming up, I'm finally ready to buy my Mac this week. It's like coming home
after a long, ugly trip!! I've done my
store research and online research but there's no better resource
than this list. I know some of you are Mac users. Is it worth the extra $300
for the processing speed and the additional 300 in cache? I spend most of my
time in Photoshop, Dreamweaver, and on the web. Yes, price IS a
consideration, but performance is too. I'm desperate to dump this 5 year old
dinosaur of a Dell which is so slow and vram deprived, it won't even open my
CS3 programs. And it can't drive a bigger monitor. Also... any preference to
windows xp portal ap: VM Ware Fusion vs Parallels Desktop. Price is same,
so it's a matter of which program performs better. I expect to continue using
my windows version of Outlook, Word, and Excel. (I could switch to Neo
Office, but as a contractor, I don't want to get rusty on my windows skills.) Any help in deciding this
quickly will be greatly appreciated!! Susan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Web: www.chewchewpoopeexpress.com |
-
[internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Susan LaBarre, 08/04/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?, Jim Ray, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Paul Cory, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
David Matusiak, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?, David Matusiak, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Susan LaBarre, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Paul Cory, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?, David Matusiak, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?, Roger Austin, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Paul Cory, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
zman, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
David Matusiak, 08/04/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] Mac Users: Mac Book Pro 15"... 2.5 or 2.8?,
Paul Cory, 08/04/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.