internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Lyman Green" <lymang AT gmail.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] loyalty
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:21:49 -0500
Well, wrong reference, it wasn't me who had the dad who worked for 39 years at the same place. My dad has worked for Diebold (yes, the voting machine Diebold) but only for 36 years.
He would love to retire but they don't pay him enough, and his 401K etc. has taken a HUGE beating.
Lyman
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Gregory S. Hopper <ghopper AT netanium.com> wrote:
Interesting topic. I'm finishing up a masters in entrepreneurship from WCU, and our final courses are in strategy and leadership. One of the things we are talking about in the leadership course is how to develop a culture like Lyman's dad worked in, or those of us who worked for IBM many years ago worked in, or that Phillip wants to start. Here's an article that is very interesting in this regard -- it's from Forbes, and one of the key quotes is "no talent, no company".
--
I'm Boba, the Fett
my backpack's, got jets...
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Ilan Volow, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Gregory S. Hopper, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Greg Brown, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], David Matusiak, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Greg Brown, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Cristóbal Palmer, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/06/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Michael Czeiszperger, 03/06/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, esther L, 03/05/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.