internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Lyman Green" <lymang AT gmail.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 17:44:17 -0500
I have two friends and one more casual acquaintance at Motricity. One knew
for sure she was losing her job some time ago. She was already looking for
other things before any official announcement was made. My other friend
knew that an announcement was coming but was fairly certain (or at least
hoped with some level of certainty) given the amount of work she had ALWAYS
going on that she would be OK. She was given her 60 day notice.
And the acquaintance? Well I haven't spoken with him yet but I suspect he
got the same notice and will be looking for work.
I think it SUCKS what Motricity is doing and I largely agree, it's the VC
folks driving this. The two friends I know at Motricity have both commented
to me over the past few years that work at Motricity is long hours and high
stress, but they felt like it was a good job nonetheless. I guess this is
what they get for loyalty and long hours.
Pfah. Bad taste in my mouth.
Lyman
-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Beckett
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 8:19 PM
To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steven Champeon wrote:
> I would have thought "FAIL" more appropriate.
Yeah, certainly. This is a massive failure. But the LOLcat-like
"kthxbai" still resonates more for me.
"KTHXBAI" as in "you are completely irrelevant to me."
Sure, employees invested their lives and their intellects in Motricity.
Means nothing to the C-suite. kthxbai!
Sure, Durham, Research Triangle, even CED, supported this company and
created an environment where it could grow and succeed. Means nothing
to the financial investors. kthxbai!
Sure, its a failing economy and 250 people are going to be without work
come summer. Fuck them! I can haz Infospace! kthxbai!
I don't know anyone who works at Motricity (or if I do, I'm unaware of
it). I don't have a dog in this fight. But this vulture capital
attitude towards people and place turns my stomach.
True justice would be if all of the 250 people who got layoff notices
today just didn't show up at work tomorrow, or ever again.* kthxbai!
Fuck you, too! You can have your company, we're not part of it. Take
your fucking capital and the fucking IP we made for you to Seattle and
don't show your snouts here again.
TaB
*As an attorney, I cannot advise this strategy. This would be deemed a
"voluntary quit" and folks would lose their unemployment benefits, not
just their severance packages.
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Beckett, JD & MBA Business Law and Consulting
828-713-1668 <http://www.tbeckett.com> 919-824-5696
Authentication instructions: <http://www.tbeckett.com/verification.html>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFHzfT4EMCfelopa1cRAihJAKDI3PFBVvdG0OqfLsAdN0HxVr3BlQCfXBD9
+OXbG1P0dhnQwcXfwJb480c=
=plPi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 2924 (20080305) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 2924 (20080305) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Cristóbal Palmer, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
H. Wade Minter, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Ilan Volow, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Gregory S. Hopper, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Greg Brown, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], David Matusiak, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Greg Brown, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Cristóbal Palmer, 03/06/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.