internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Steven Champeon <schampeo AT hesketh.com>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:24:48 -0500
on Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 06:21:48PM -0500, Thomas Beckett wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ilan Volow wrote:
> > - Thinking I was probably lucky Motricity didn't call back for a job
> > interview two years ago.
>
> Motricity to Durham (and it's employees): I can haz Seattle! kthxbai!
I would have thought "FAIL" more appropriate.
Oh, btw: http://faildogs.com/ for more inspiration.
--
hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2553 w: http://hesketh.com/
antispam news, solutions for sendmail, exim, postfix: http://enemieslist.com/
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Cox, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Cox, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Cristóbal Palmer, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
H. Wade Minter, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Ilan Volow, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Gregory S. Hopper, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Greg Brown, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], David Matusiak, 03/06/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.