internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
[internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?]
- From: Phillip Rhodes <mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?]
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:00:08 -0500
Lance A. Brown wrote:
Lyman Green wrote:
I guess this is what they get for loyalty and long hours.
Heh. I've not worked for *ANY* company that engendered my loyalty at any point in my professional career in IT. None. It's a crying shame.
My father is justifiably proud that he was able to start working for a firm before he completed is civil engineering degree and retired from that same company 39 years later. There were ups and downs but Wells Concrete Products took care of Dad and he took care of them. That kind of company/worker loyalty just flat out doesn't exist anymore, anywhere.
I think you'll see it come back eventually. This short-sighted approach
to business that has become so common place can't sustain itself forever. I believe that as the world economy becomes even *more* competitive that companies will have to return to the approach of
developing a real relationship with their employees and having that
two way commitment / loyalty to be really successful.
Now maybe I'm just being overly optimistic, but if I'm ever
in a position to launch the company I want to launch, I hope
to try and put those principles into practice. It's the old
saw about "if you can't find the company you want to work for, start it." :-)
TTYL,
--
Phillip Rhodes
Chief Architect - OpenQabal
https://openqabal.dev.java.net
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/philliprhodes
begin:vcard fn:Phillip Rhodes n:Rhodes;Phillip adr:;;P.O. Box 16905;Chapel Hill;NC;27516;USA email;internet:mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk tel;home:919-928-0236 url:http://www.linkedin.com/in/philliprhodes version:2.1 end:vcard
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Cristóbal Palmer, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
H. Wade Minter, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Ilan Volow, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Gregory S. Hopper, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Greg Brown, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], David Matusiak, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Greg Brown, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Cristóbal Palmer, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/06/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Michael Czeiszperger, 03/06/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.