internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?]
- From: "Cristóbal Palmer" <cristobalpalmer AT gmail.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?]
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:41:06 -0500
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:08 PM, David Matusiak <dave AT matusiak.org> wrote:
> paragraph above, just replace 'shareholders' with 'students' and
> 'market advantage' with 'whatever the students and their parents are
> bitching about' and you have the exact same scenario.
Follow the money. It's not just any students. In-state,
non-scholarship undergraduate students who aren't participating in
student government or the DTH account for a huge percentage of the
student body at UNC, for example, but I have to wonder how much their
opinions (or their parents' for that matter) really affect things.
Cheers,
--
Cristóbal M. Palmer
http://tinyurl.com/3apraw "They also abandoned other volumes, later,
while fleeing from the librarians."
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Gregory S. Hopper, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty, Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Lance A. Brown, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Greg Brown, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], David Matusiak, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Greg Brown, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Cristóbal Palmer, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/06/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] loyalty [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Michael Czeiszperger, 03/06/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Tarus Balog, 03/05/2008
- [internetworkers] Stephenson [was: Sure is quiet, innit?], Phillip Rhodes, 03/05/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.