internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Thomas Beckett <thomas AT tbeckett.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:09:58 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greg Cox wrote:
> You missed the (figurative) smoldering crater that is/was Motricity.
> http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/980542.html
Capital is a fickle mistress, isn't it? Someone tell them to not let
the screen door smack their asses on the way out of town.
TaB
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Beckett, JD & MBA Business Law and Consulting
828-713-1668 <http://www.tbeckett.com> 919-824-5696
Authentication instructions: <http://www.tbeckett.com/verification.html>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFHzZB1EMCfelopa1cRAsoQAJ0Qi+luOLb9QU+7kCfNntBqSjEwdACglLXI
NPbOdkGevvPj4OxmqiHv3sc=
=aiMw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Mark Turner, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
burnett, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Mark Turner, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Cox, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Cox, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Cox, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Cox, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Greg Brown, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Cristóbal Palmer, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
H. Wade Minter, 03/04/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Ilan Volow, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?, Tarus Balog, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Lyman Green, 03/05/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Steven Champeon, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
Thomas Beckett, 03/04/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] Sure is quiet, innit?,
burnett, 03/04/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.