internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462
- From: Thomas Beckett <thomas AT tbeckett.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:00:01 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Lyman Green wrote:
> I would suggest you not let this go for long without getting
> assistance. I would bet they have no qualms about trashing your
> credit rating if you are considered to have 'defaulted' on these bills
> even if you don't have anything to do with them.
I agree with Lyman. They have violated a number of US and NC laws at
this poing, on credit reporting and debt collection.
Also, this may not be AT&T proper, it might just be a collection agency
they've hired. Collection agencies are notorious for not giving a shit
about anyone.
It might help to send a letter to the CEO of AT&T. The CEO will never
read it, of course, but the problem will be addressed and routed to the
proper place from the top. I usually look at the investor relations
info on a company's website or at finance.yahoo.com to find out who is
CEO.
http://www.att.com/gen/investor-relations?pid=5711
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=T
TaB
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Beckett, JD & MBA Business Law and Consulting
828-713-1668 <http://www.tbeckett.com> 919-824-5696
Authentication instructions: <http://www.tbeckett.com/verification.html>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFGujzhEMCfelopa1cRAhlIAKCTx1kZ1rhKMTt7/IzuD4elm90Y7ACg3wIb
EWaPd5ZsGEH/2/92sCPO+0I=
=i9Wc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Mark Turner, 08/08/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Lyman Green, 08/08/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Michael Czeiszperger, 08/08/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Thomas Beckett, 08/08/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Mark Turner, 08/08/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Thomas Beckett, 08/08/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Cheryl Smith, 08/16/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Mark Turner, 08/16/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Simon Spero, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Shea Tisdale, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Steven Champeon, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Shea Tisdale, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Steven Champeon, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Steven Champeon, 08/20/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Simon Spero, 08/19/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Mark Turner, 08/16/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Mark Turner, 08/08/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Lyman Green, 08/08/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.