Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground"

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Minton <dminton AT mindspring.com>
  • To: InterNetWorkers <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground"
  • Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:51:53 -0400

On 6/1/07 3:39 PM, "Tanner Lovelace" <clubjuggler AT gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/1/07, Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT gmail.com> wrote:
>> It has been expressed that replying to OT posts with something along
>> the lines of "This doesn't belong here, check out the InterNetWorkers
>> list" would be treating INW as TriLUG's "Dumping Ground". I disagree.
>
> For the record, I was the one who stated that INW is not TriLUG's
> dumping ground. Ian also characterizes how things were expressed.
> I have no problem with "This doesn't belong here, check out the
> InternetWorkers list". That's perfectly fine. Instead, what the person
> in question was trying to do was move an already started thread
> over to INW by CCing INW and asking everyone on the trilug list
> to drop it. I have a problem with this because it brings the INW (who
> are not a strict subset of the TriLUG group) into the middle of a
> thread and makes people wonder what the heck is up.
>
> So, short summary: Starting up new threads on INW, ok. Moving
> threads from TriLUG to INW, not ok, at least to me. Others are
> more than welcome to disagree with me.

Funny, I thought TriLUG was our dumping ground ;-)

David






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page