internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground"
- From: "Jim Ray" <jim AT neuse.net>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground"
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:51:05 -0400
At least everyone on INW always agrees with each other and never has any bad
vibes.
Regards,
Jim
Jim Ray, President
Neuse River Networks
tel: 919-838-1672 cell: 919-606-1772
http://www.Neuse.Net
Connecting You to the World since 1997
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:internetworkers-
> bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of matusiak
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 3:01 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground"
>
> From a hindsight 20/20 perspective, the Triangle InterNetWorkers
> group and discussion list was practically founded on these
> principles. If it's "Too Hot" for TriLUG, then it is right at home
> on the INW list. (Keep in mind that these thoughts are my own and
> probably not 100% in-line with the views of other group members.)
> However, if it wasn't for the racier TriLUG-rejected conversations,
> then there probably wouldn't be any traffic on this list at all.
>
> Discuss.
>
> Dave ;)
>
>
> On Jun 1, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Ian Meyer wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone!
> >
> > As you may or may not know. I ended up on this list as a result of a
> > search for tamales that I posted as OT to the TriLUG mailing list. I
> > got a couple replies there and a nicely-worded "Hey, you might check
> > out INW for things like this..."
> >
> > There's some turmoil going on over there in TriLUG-land with people
> > complaining about OT posting volumes, and people complaining about
> > the complainers and so on and so forth.
> >
> > It has been expressed that replying to OT posts with something along
> > the lines of "This doesn't belong here, check out the InterNetWorkers
> > list" would be treating INW as TriLUG's "Dumping Ground". I disagree.
> >
> > So would anyone here have a problem with OT posters on the TriLUG
> > list being referred to this as a potential venue for their
> > discussions?
> >
> > ~ian
>
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
Ian Meyer, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
matusiak, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] [addendum] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", matusiak, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", Jim Ray, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
Michael Czeiszperger, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", burnett, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
Tanner Lovelace, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
David Minton, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", Tanner Lovelace, 06/01/2007
-
[internetworkers] postworthy!,
Bob Kucera, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!,
Tanner Lovelace, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!,
Greg Brown, 06/02/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!, Jim Ray, 06/02/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!,
Greg Brown, 06/02/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!,
Tanner Lovelace, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", Michael Best, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
David Minton, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
matusiak, 06/01/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.