internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground"
- From: "Tanner Lovelace" <clubjuggler AT gmail.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground"
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:39:36 -0400
On 6/1/07, Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT gmail.com> wrote:
It has been expressed that replying to OT posts with something along
the lines of "This doesn't belong here, check out the InterNetWorkers
list" would be treating INW as TriLUG's "Dumping Ground". I disagree.
For the record, I was the one who stated that INW is not TriLUG's
dumping ground. Ian also characterizes how things were expressed.
I have no problem with "This doesn't belong here, check out the
InternetWorkers list". That's perfectly fine. Instead, what the person
in question was trying to do was move an already started thread
over to INW by CCing INW and asking everyone on the trilug list
to drop it. I have a problem with this because it brings the INW (who
are not a strict subset of the TriLUG group) into the middle of a
thread and makes people wonder what the heck is up.
So, short summary: Starting up new threads on INW, ok. Moving
threads from TriLUG to INW, not ok, at least to me. Others are
more than welcome to disagree with me.
Cheers,
Tanner
--
Tanner Lovelace
clubjuggler at gmail dot com
http://wtl.wayfarer.org/
(fieldless) In fess two roundels in pale, a billet fesswise and an
increscent, all sable.
-
[internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
Ian Meyer, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
matusiak, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] [addendum] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", matusiak, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", Jim Ray, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
Michael Czeiszperger, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", burnett, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
Tanner Lovelace, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
David Minton, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", Tanner Lovelace, 06/01/2007
-
[internetworkers] postworthy!,
Bob Kucera, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!,
Tanner Lovelace, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!,
Greg Brown, 06/02/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!, Jim Ray, 06/02/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!,
Greg Brown, 06/02/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] postworthy!,
Tanner Lovelace, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", Michael Best, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
David Minton, 06/01/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
zman, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", Brian Henning, 06/01/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground", Tarus Balog, 06/07/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] INW as TriLUG's OT "dumping ground",
matusiak, 06/01/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.