internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics
- From: zman <zman AT shell.neverwhere.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:25:16 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
How does that work if there's multiple domains being hosted from the
same machine, all from the same IP address? I'm assuming that the
single IP address is only going to resolve to a single domain name,
meaning the rest of the domains are out of luck?
Not at all, there are plenty of domains that are on the same IP, way more than you would think. ARIN has gotten really hard to get IP space from and now a lot of ISP's and hosting companies will serve the multiple domains from the same IP, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this at all....
no to mention the fact that most business' have multiple doamins for the same business...
There's nothing wrong with a single IP having multiple PTRs, though it
is rare to see it.
not so much... look again...
I'm currently using the same machine to host a couple of different of
my own domains, simply because its easier to set up multiple domains
on a single computer than it is to set up multiple computers. For
example, learningtosee.org and czeiszperger.org don't get much
traffic, so it didn't make sense to give them separate computers. I
suppose that they could have been set up with virtual IP addresses...
Don't sweat it...
Scott H. Zekanis
zman AT kungfumonkey.com
http://www.rod-o-rama.com
http://www.thehellbenders.com
1957 Buick Riviera Hardtop (2 dr., 425" Nailhead)
1960 International B100
1923 Buick Roadster (Dual Quad 425" Nailhead) 1990 Ducati 750 Sport
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Michael Czeiszperger, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Michael Czeiszperger, 12/12/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Michael Czeiszperger, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Steven Champeon, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Michael Czeiszperger, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Steven Champeon, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, zman, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Steven Champeon, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, zman, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Steven Champeon, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, zman, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Steven Champeon, 12/13/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, zman, 12/13/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Michael Czeiszperger, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Michael Czeiszperger, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.