Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Tony Spencer <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags
  • Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:56:18 -0400

You're right Steve but your scenario is more like the cause to my effect
(the backlink part). Worthwhile content is only one of many ways to get the
links.


On 4/25/06 6:39 PM, "Steven Champeon" <schampeo AT hesketh.com> wrote:

> on Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:15:05PM -0400, Tony Spencer wrote:
>> Here is my super rough breakdown of the factors involved in good ranking:
>>
>> 30% age of site (older == better)
>> 60% backlinks (quantity, age of link, anchor text, TLD)
>> 10% content on the page
>
> Funny, I'd have thought the most breakdown was more like
>
> 99% worthwhile content
> 1% getting the word out so people link back to your site
>
> But yeah, I agree that it helps to have been around long enough to
> have given people time to link to you.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page