internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags
- From: Tony Spencer <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/ jim AT neuse.net, " <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:15:51 -0400
Title: Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags Or you could also go back to html and just tweak Apache or IIS to treat html as shtml. I would go with this solution instead of the 301 redirect.
On 4/26/06 9:09 AM, "Jim Ray" <jim AT neuse.net> wrote:
well, i reckon my backlinks and ratings just went to @#$% in a hand basket when i broke all my links by changing *.html to *.shtml for server side includes. oh, well.
Jim Ray, President
Neuse River Network, Inc.
tel: 919-838-1672 x111
toll free: 800-617-7652
http://www.Neuse.Net
Ask about our Clean Technologies. Established in the Carolinas 1997.
Tony Spencer wrote:
But yeah, I agree that it helps to have been around long enough to
have given people time to link to you.
There is more to it than that. A site built in 1999 that received 10
backlinks in the year 1999 is given a bigger boost than a site built in 2005
that received 10 backlinks in 2005. There is a heavy dampening effect
levied on sites whose backlinks are relatively new.
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags,
Tony Spencer, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags,
Steven Champeon, 04/25/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags, Tony Spencer, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags,
Tony Spencer, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags,
Scott, 04/25/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags, Tony Spencer, 04/25/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags, Scott, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags,
Scott, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags,
Jim Ray, 04/26/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags, Tony Spencer, 04/26/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags, Steven Champeon, 04/26/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags, Tony Spencer, 04/26/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags, Jim Ray, 04/26/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags,
Steven Champeon, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Question about <META> description and keywords tags,
Tony Spencer, 04/25/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.