internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- From: "Michael Best" <mbest AT dasya.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:02:35 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: zman [mailto:zman AT gibbon.kungfumonkey.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 1:53 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML
> artists)
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Michael Best wrote:
> > Scott, I noticed all of your replies are also going to two
> places. I guess
> > your email client is not much better.
>
> It only does it when I get mail from an Outlook client that is configured
> incorrectly. Notice it doesn't do it with yours.
It appears to be because Jim's client inserts a Reply-to header, which most
clients can be configured to do.
-- Michael Best
-
Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies)
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Sil Greene, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Sil Greene, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Steven Champeon, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Michael Best, 03/09/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/09/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/09/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Michael Best, 03/10/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Michael D. Thomas, 03/10/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/09/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Paul Smith, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tom Boucher, 03/10/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Alan MacHett, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Chris Grindstaff, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.