internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty)labor
- From: "Jim Ray" <jim AT neuse.net>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty)labor
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 16:05:51 -0500
If I had one, I wouldn't be flipping it out at an interview :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of David
R.Matusiak
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 4:03 PM
To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and
pretty)labor
well, that would depend on the interview style, no?
On Thursday, January 22, 2004, at 04:00 PM, Jim Ray wrote:
> Prince alberts aren't highly visible at all.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:58 PM
> To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and
> pretty)labor
>
>>> their highly-visible piecings.
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
David R . Matusiak, 01/22/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty)labor,
Jim Ray, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
David R . Matusiak, 01/22/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty)labor, Jim Ray, 01/22/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty)labor, zman, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
David R . Matusiak, 01/22/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor, zman, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
Brian Godfrey, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
zman, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
U. Jason Gloege Jr., 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
zman, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
Jeremy Portzer, 01/22/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor, zman, 01/22/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor, Paul Smith, 01/23/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
Jeremy Portzer, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
zman, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
U. Jason Gloege Jr., 01/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor,
zman, 01/22/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty) labor, Jeremy Portzer, 01/22/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Fwd: RTP business whines for cheap (and pretty)labor,
Jim Ray, 01/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.