Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Michael D. Thomas" <mdthomas AT mindspring.com>
  • To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
  • Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:51 -0500

> But all of this is irrelevant, and given that I'm opposed to C/R on
the
> same principles it appears you are, I'm not sure why we're even
arguing.


I suspect that you are arguing because you are arguing. ;-)

I started this tangent "just for fun." I admit that I hadn't completely
thought through my use of the word bulk to describe what C/R does -- I
was just considering that C/R systems send out a lot of email. Thanks
for responding and pointing out my error. I hope that I didn't cause any
"silly confusion" on the very serious topics of joe-jobbing and spam.

I hope that everyone finds this list to be a place where we can refine
our ideas and thoughts through open discussion. I don't think that every
single thought must be bullett-proofed and purfectly articulated to
enter the discussion. However, I do think that it's important to the
community that we are all willing to accept criticism and to be
constructive in the criticism that we give.

I thought that the gamesmanship displayed in the remainder of the thread
was impressive, thought provoking and educational. I hope others thought
the same.

Cheers!








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page