internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT mac.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:33:38 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
CRAP! I finally get re-subscribed, and this is all I get...off to the archives I go...
Ian
- -------------------------
What's that file that's attached you ask? Well, its my Gnu Privacy Guard (GnuPG) signautre that can be used to authenticate this email. For more information, check out http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html
On Nov 20, 2003, at 2:27 PM, Michael D. Thomas wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----But all of this is irrelevant, and given that I'm opposed to C/R onthe
same principles it appears you are, I'm not sure why we're evenarguing.
I suspect that you are arguing because you are arguing. ;-)
I started this tangent "just for fun." I admit that I hadn't completely
thought through my use of the word bulk to describe what C/R does -- I
was just considering that C/R systems send out a lot of email. Thanks
for responding and pointing out my error. I hope that I didn't cause any
"silly confusion" on the very serious topics of joe-jobbing and spam.
I hope that everyone finds this list to be a place where we can refine
our ideas and thoughts through open discussion. I don't think that every
single thought must be bullett-proofed and purfectly articulated to
enter the discussion. However, I do think that it's important to the
community that we are all willing to accept criticism and to be
constructive in the criticism that we give.
I thought that the gamesmanship displayed in the remainder of the thread
was impressive, thought provoking and educational. I hope others thought
the same.
Cheers!
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/vRcUDaRr/N2jLBARAu/NAJ9TAjDi+t2j6x/iBgW91eTrvm28/wCgg/C7
rFjqVu7UgmfNq1myQPVMueo=
=SS2d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- C/R system math - Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Jeremy Portzer, 11/20/2003
- Re: C/R system math - Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- Re: C/R system math [kook!] - Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Sil Greene, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Michael D. Thomas, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Ian Meyer, 11/20/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Sil Greene, 11/20/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, K. Jo Garner, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Sil Greene, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] [Tech] SPAM the SPAMMERS, Alan MacHett, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tarus Balog, 11/20/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.