internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Sil Greene <Sil_greene AT unc.edu>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:58:27 -0500 (EST)
Reported 03.11.20 11:48 from Steven Champeon:
.:on Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:47:00AM -0500, Tanner Lovelace wrote:
.:> Steven Champeon wrote:
.:> >If I can block the sender and the entire problem goes away, it's not UBE.
.:>
.:> But, all of those messages come from different people. You *can't*
.:> just block the sender and have the problem go away.
.:
.:No, all those messages come from the C/R system. Or maybe I'm not
.:following you.
All those messages come from *a* C/R system, on behalf of individual
users; maybe as many as a handful of users are on the same mailserver
or C/R system. This is assuming C/R as a technology has penetrated
somewhat, so you're dealing with a variety of implementations. If this
doesn't help clarify the situation, please reread the thread.
--
"If you put your supper dish to your ears you can hear the sounds
of a restaurant." --Snoopy (Charles Schultz 02-12-2000 RIP)
Sil_Greene AT unc.edu
-
C/R system math - Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
, (continued)
- C/R system math - Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Jeremy Portzer, 11/20/2003
- Re: C/R system math - Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- Re: C/R system math [kook!] - Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Sil Greene, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Michael D. Thomas, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Ian Meyer, 11/20/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Sil Greene, 11/20/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, K. Jo Garner, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Sil Greene, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] [Tech] SPAM the SPAMMERS, Alan MacHett, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tarus Balog, 11/20/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.