Homestead mailing list

[william Eggers <wce1482 AT yahoo.com>]

I take 4 size "0" capsules a day.  Then if I have aches and pains during the 
day, which I usually do, I take 2 more capsules for that at a time instead of 
a commercial pain killer. So the answer is a minimum of 4 and sometimes as 
many as 10 or12.

--- On Sun, 12/21/08, EarthNSky <erthnsky AT bellsouth.net> wrote:

From: EarthNSky <erthnsky AT bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] out of the blue
To: wce1482 AT yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, December 21, 2008, 10:53 PM

That's really cool.
I hate the taste of passionflower.yuk, but it works for me to get me to 
sleep. 
I have thought about doing this for passionflower so I don't have to deal
with the teas.  It grows wild here and I collect it for teas.  Encapsulating 
it
would be awesome, and of course, I could use it for turmeric, too.

How many turmeric pills do you take, and what size capsule?

william Eggers wrote:
> 
> It is not hard, just somewhat tedious.  The thing I use, used size
"0" capsules.  It does 50 at a time.  You have to seperate the halves
of the capsules and put one half in the holder, then put what you are 
capluling
in and use a tamper to pack it and then put the cap on.
> Try www.cap-m-quik.com <http://www.cap-m-quik.com>.  Let me know
what you think.
> --- On *Sun, 12/21/08, EarthNSky /<erthnsky AT bellsouth.net>/* wrote:
> 
>     From: EarthNSky <erthnsky AT bellsouth.net>
>     Subject: Re: [Homestead] out of the blue
>     To: wce1482 AT yahoo.com, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
>     Date: Sunday, December 21, 2008, 11:42 AM
> 
>     william Eggers wrote:
>     > I buy it in bulk and as I don't want to eat everyday,  I
bought a
>     > tool to put it in capsules and take it that way.  Works for me.
> 
>     Is this a hard process William?
>     Can you give a link or something to show us what kind of encapsulating
tool you
>     have and how it might work/cost for gel caps, etc.
> 
>     B
>     -- The true significance of Sacajawea's involvement in the Lewis
&
>     Clark
>     expedition is that it was the first documented trip in history where
men
>     asked a woman for directions and followed them, allowing them to
arrive
>     at their destination.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database:
270.9.19/1857 - Release Date: 12/19/2008 10:09 AM
> 

-- The true significance of Sacajawea's involvement in the Lewis &
Clark
expedition is that it was the first documented trip in history where men
asked a woman for directions and followed them, allowing them to arrive
at their destination.




>From lynnw1366 AT hotmail.com  Mon Dec 22 11:46:16 2008
Return-Path: <lynnw1366 AT hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
        id 7E47A4C016; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:46:16 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=STOX_REPLY_TYPE
        autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3
Received: from bay0-omc2-s27.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s27.bay0.hotmail.com
        [65.54.246.163])
        by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BF74C015
        for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:46:16 -0500 
(EST)
Received: from hotmail.com ([64.4.49.15]) by bay0-omc2-s27.bay0.hotmail.com
        with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
        Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:46:15 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
        Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:46:15 -0800
Message-ID: <BAY138-DAV5371B1D72579237246A11AFEF0 AT phx.gbl>
Received: from 24.229.218.11 by BAY138-DAV5.phx.gbl with DAV;
        Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:46:11 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [24.229.218.11]
X-Originating-Email: [lynnw1366 AT hotmail.com]
X-Sender: lynnw1366 AT hotmail.com
From: "Lynn Wigglesworth" <lynnw1366 AT hotmail.com>
To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
References: <280479.116.qm AT web53901.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:46:08 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
        reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Dec 2008 16:46:15.0375 (UTC)
        FILETIME=[CE0CDDF0:01C96454]
Subject: Re: [Homestead] [Homestead ] MY  microcosm of economic downturn
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <homestead.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:46:16 -0000


> So, where is the remedy?  Surely things can't continue this way.  That was
> my original observation.  The picture you just >drew was not so much bleak
> as it is unsustainable.

Bob; it's always been this way. There has always been a class at the bottom
that can barely get by. I think that class is getting bigger, while the rich
get richer. I'm with Bev...there isn't much of a middle class anymore (where
do you draw the line at the bottom of 'middle class'? I suspect many on this
list don't make the cut). It's the 'haves' and the "have nots".  Since the
rich run everything, there's not much the lower class can do (except elect
Obama, haha).

Lynn Wigglesworth