Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?
  • Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:26:14 -0700 (PDT)

Can't let this softball go, James can give better explain; But, we did not
fire upon New York because they didn't give us extra money. Lincoln's army
fired upon South Carolina, for that reason. And so it began...bobf


--- On Wed, 10/1/08, Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com> wrote:

> From: Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com>
> Subject: Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?
> To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 4:12 PM
> On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Clansgian AT wmconnect.com wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >>> Which one of those is your preference to
> describe Bush's Iraq
> >>> invasion?
> >
> > In the beginning it was a fight. Both sides were in
> it. I mean that
> > technically, not morally nor is it a comment on the
> expediency. One
> > sided perhaps,
> > but a fight none the less.
>
> I am Civil War knowledge impaired. Are you saying that in
> the
> beginning, the South was not fighting?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/bobford79%40yahoo.com
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page