Homestead mailing list

[KNat <knat AT sprintmail.com>]

Marie McHarry wrote:
>  On 9/22/07, Lynda <lurine AT softcom.net> wrote:
>   
> > Ah yes, the brilliance once again of the DOE.  Let's put the nuclear waste
> > dump right smack dab in the middle of a major earthquake zone.  Sheesh, the
> > DOE's own facilities out in that region have been damaged by earthquakes.
> >
> >     
>  So... where do you want to put it? 
In the children's bedrooms of the people who got the gain from it? The 
companies that produced it, the lobbiests, the politicians, the 
universities declaring it safe. Add the people in university programs 
and companies promoting to produce more. Surely in such minute 
quantities they'd all agree it was a safe level. Otherwise they can 
spend that gain on finishing their usage. It has to be considered in the 
stream not as a separate entity!

I appreciate looking at disposal besides military use but injecting the 
planet anywhere is a global decision, whether in the ocean or earth's 
mantle. Keep responsibility with profit for a sane economy.

Kathyann
(Gene, I think I understand how peaceful people get cranky)