Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] An article cheering the Supremes

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Clansgian AT wmconnect.com
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] An article cheering the Supremes
  • Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 08:57:24 EDT




> I distinguish personal rights--speech, religion, trial by jury--as distinct
> from real property rights.

You very well may, but fortunately the constitution does not. At least as
far as depriving you of it without due process of law. Real property is the
same as all other property.

And it's Lynda who has the straight of this (this time). Putting local
officials in charge of deciding what is public use is like putting the fox in
charge of your hens. In all the blurbs you've given over the years about the
DC
Whorehouse, however corrupt the US politicians are, local politicians are
doubly
so and then some.

If you want to strip the old varnish off a floor, just about the most
effective solvent is gasoline, but you'd be a fool to use it for that because
of the
huge risk of the harm it can cause. Likewise allowing local politicians to
decide what is a legitimate public use sets up a scenario of temptation and
corruption.

If you go to he website run by "Castle Coalition" who are fighting eminent
domain abuse, you will find my town listed as one of the examples where it
was
effectively fought. This is the home to the NASCAR's Bristol Motor Speedway.

Just across the road from the speedway are three family businesses which have
been there for many decades. No offer was made to the owners of their
propoerty but the manager of the speedway went to the city council and asked
them to
condemn the property so the speedway could have it for private development
(condos). The city council got the local HUD to do a study and found the
property to be blighted and came up with a plan for 'redefelopment.' Trouble
is,
that study ONLY included those three properties. Caught with their pants
down,
the city council expanded the study to include the entire parkway, with plans
to redevelop those three properties right away and consider the others at
some
indefinate date in the future. Obviously a ploy to grab the land but put a
spin of legitimatacy on it.

The families involved got with their friends and neighbors and inititated a
recall of the three of the five city council members. They were successful
in
removing one from office and put the fear of God into the others. The
condemnation procedures were dropped.

But it goes to show how easily locals are corrupted. This is the very reason
that property rights are constitutionally guaranteed.

James




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page