Homestead mailing list

[C Russell <mtbetter AT yahoo.com>]

Marie

I'm not particularly savvy about the high courts, I
admit.  If, as these editors suggest, the Court wished
to refuse to second-guess the economic judgments of
city and state legislatures in the eminent domain
matter, would not the justices have declined to hear
the case?

Cathy

--- Marie McHarry <mmcharry AT dtnspeed.net> wrote:

> As most of you who will read this know, I'm more
> than a little queasy about
> the Supreme's ruling on eminent domain. Just to add
> a bit to the other side
> of the argument, I submit this article (printed in
> full because TNR now has
> most of its material available only to subscribers):
> 
> Breyer Restraint 
> by the Editors     
>  
> 



                
____________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com