homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37
- From: "Lynda" <lurine AT softcom.net>
- To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 16:29:55 -0700
That's the problem. What they say is not necessarily the truth. The only
way to find it out is to go to the towns where they are located and ask the
local folks.
They'll tell you all day long and twice on Sunday that the plant in Humboldt
County was safe. Well, it wasn't and isn't. The ground water around it is
contaminated. Spent fuel rods are "unaccounted for." The air quality went
to shit when the plant was running.
The plant was shut down years ago. the air quality has improved but the
spent fuel rods are still missing and the ground water is still contaminated
and no one is doing anything to clean it up.
However, you will read in papers that it was just peachy having the plant
there and that there were no problems.
Like I said, go ask some of the locals in France just how great their power
plants are. What the public is being told may not tally with what the
locals know is really happening.
Lynda
----- Original Message -----
From: Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com>
To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37
>
> >We have hundreds of future Chernobyls awaiting us
> >already, because there is no nation on earth that is making a real
priority
> >of maintaining that kind of education and training and infrastructure
over
> >hundreds of years, let alone thousands of years.
>
> I have evolved from a knee-jerk nuclear power plant opponent to a
pragmatic
> questioner: what better viable solution do you propose?
>
> I don't have the latest stats, but the last time I read about nuclear
> France, it was generating about eighty percent of its electricity with
> nuclear power. Other European countries were having to cut back on use
> while France had a surplus. And unless something has happened that I
> missed, the French nuclear safety record is intact.
>
-
[Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37,
ted, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37,
Gene GeRue, 05/29/2005
-
[Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Marie McHarry, 05/29/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Don Bowen, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Don Bowen, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Rob, 05/29/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Don Bowen, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Rob, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37,
Lynda, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Rob, 05/29/2005
- RE: [Homestead] Re: nuke power, Marie McHarry, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Lynda, 05/30/2005
-
RE: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Marie McHarry, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Lynda, 05/30/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power, Gene GeRue, 05/30/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power, Lynda, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Lynda, 05/30/2005
-
RE: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Marie McHarry, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Rob, 05/29/2005
-
[Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Marie McHarry, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37,
Gene GeRue, 05/29/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37, DSanner106, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37,
Clansgian, 05/30/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37, Lynda, 05/30/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.