homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: "Lynda" <lurine AT softcom.net>
- To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:43:28 -0700
A decomissioned plant simply doesn't supply electricity to anything. They
still have to have staff to keep the whatsits from doing whatever. However,
the plant is emitting far less now than it did when they were up and
running. It's been decomissioned for years and years and they still haven't
gotten rid of the spent material or finished closing it down.
They tried bringing in a coal plant but voters stopped it.
What we need is what happened in the 70s when businesses were forced, along
with everyone else, to reduce power use. Try going into some of these
businesses that have enough lights going to light a whole city.
Lynda
----- Original Message -----
From: Marie McHarry <mmcharry AT dtnspeed.net>
To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 10:43 AM
Subject: RE: [Homestead] Re: nuke power
> << [In Humboldt Country,] they used pond water that they contaminated and
> the contaminates shoot out of the stacks day and night. >>
>
> If the plant is decommissioned, why would it still be polluting anything?
I
> guess this would be radioactive materials, but it's not clear how those
> materials would get into the cooling towers.
>
> I'd rather have a nuclear plant in my neighborhood than a coal-fired plant
> -- it's much cleaner (assuming, of course, that it doesn't melt down). :)
>
> Marie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/lurine%40softcom.net
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
>
>
-
[Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world
, (continued)
-
[Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Marie McHarry, 05/29/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Don Bowen, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Don Bowen, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Rob, 05/29/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Don Bowen, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Rob, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37,
Lynda, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Rob, 05/29/2005
- RE: [Homestead] Re: nuke power, Marie McHarry, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Lynda, 05/30/2005
-
RE: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Marie McHarry, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Lynda, 05/30/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power, Gene GeRue, 05/30/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power, Lynda, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Lynda, 05/30/2005
-
RE: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Marie McHarry, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: nuke power,
Rob, 05/29/2005
-
[Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Marie McHarry, 05/29/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37,
Lynda, 05/30/2005
- RE: [Homestead] Re: Homestead Digest, Vol 10, Issue 37, Marie McHarry, 05/30/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.