corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: George F Somsel <gfsomsel AT juno.com>
- To: corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc: corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:18:34 -0500
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:55:27 -0600 "John Brand" <jbrand AT gvsd.mb.ca>
writes:
> > John Brand wrote:
> > > 'Christos,' of course, is Greek for the Hebrew mashiach. The
> Aryan
> > > cognate would be 'atman' which is understood to be the higher
> self or
> > > spirit.
>
> Jeffrey Gibson writes:
> > Cognates are words which linguistically share a common root. I'd
> be
> > grateful if you'd show how "atman" and "mashiach" are related
> > linguistically.
>
> John responds:
> I stand corrected. 'Atman is not a cognate for mashiach. Atman
>
> as a life principle would have semantic fields which overlap with
>
> the Greek logos and mashiach would be closer to ho logos, would
>
> it not? Thus, Christ is the incarnation of logos. Heraclietus used
> logos as the life principle of which we are all manifestations.
>
> There is a closer relationship between the Aramaic meshia and the
> Aryan
> Maitreya. And this is where there is overlap between Isaiahs
> anointed
> and the Zoroastrian Maitreya. Maitreya means friendly, loving and
> is
> derived from maitri which is the Sanskrit form of Mithras. Arnold
> Toynbee
> posits Mithras as one of the competitors for Lord of the Roman
> cult along
> with Jesus (Mankind and Mother Earth). Which brings me back to
> the
> original question that Jim and Tim were discussing
__________________________
I fail to see how you find any connection between Maitreya and Mashiach
either as cognate words or as having the same semantic domain. Perhaps
you could enlighten me?
george
gfsomsel
___________
-
RE: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?
, (continued)
- RE: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?, tiona, 01/16/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
George F Somsel, 01/17/2005
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?, Harold R. Holmyard III, 01/17/2005
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?, George F Somsel, 01/17/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
tiona, 01/18/2005
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?, Edgar Krentz, 01/18/2005
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?, nanosmd, 01/18/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
George F Somsel, 01/19/2005
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?, Mark D. Nanos, 01/19/2005
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?, George F Somsel, 01/19/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
George F Somsel, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
John Brand, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
Tim Gallant, 01/20/2005
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?, John Brand, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
Tony Buglass, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
John Brand, 01/20/2005
- [Corpus-Paul] Linguistics and Conceptual community, Edgar Krentz, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
Jeffrey B. Gibson, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
John Brand, 01/20/2005
- [Corpus-Paul] similarities, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 01/20/2005
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] similarities, John Brand, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
John Brand, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
John Brand, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
Tim Gallant, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Did Paul break the Law?,
John Brand, 01/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.