Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: Paul's conversion & Gal. 1:16

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Ronald Troxel <rltroxel AT facstaff.wisc.edu>
  • To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Paul's conversion & Gal. 1:16
  • Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 06:25:26 -0600


Jonathan:
>Section 4.a. of BAGD's discussion of EN is not limited to indirect objects;
>in fact, section 4.a. lists examples where EN+Dative is equivalent to the
>ordinary dative. That's not much different from saying that 'EN with EMOI
>is "little more than an *emphasized* version of EMOI on its own"'. BAGD
>lists Gal 1:16 in this category.

My objection is to using "emphatic" to describe this. "Emphasis" is too
often becomes a catchall category. Why not describe it grammatically as a
syntagm of the indirect object (in Gal 1:16)?

Ron

Ronald L. Troxel, Ph.D.
Department of Hebrew and Semitic Studies
1340 Van Hise Hall
1220 Linden Dr.
Madison, WI 53706




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page