RTP-area local music and culture

[grady <grady AT ibiblio.org>]

Cool! Since he apparently believes you gotta be fluent in the internals 
of any technology you use, I wonder if he'll fix my TV for me . . . the 
place I used to take it just sells ice cream now.

James Hepler wrote:
> So to sum up, this guy is better than YOU.
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:59 AM, <chapelhillguitarist AT hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 29, 12:54 pm, jim.brant... AT gmail.com wrote:
> > > I use iTunes to organize my library of no-less-than-320 kbps music and
> > > it works much better than anything else I've tried (and this comes
> > > from a former Apple anti-fanboy). I agree that the iTunes store is
> > > worthless given the poor sound quality of the products. But who needs
> > > it? Importing stuff is dead easy.
> > I keep my digital media library organized using the tools provided
> > with the OS.  Either Linux or Windoze or Mac allow you to create and
> > name folders.  What is so hard about that?  I don't need an online
> > store keeping tabs of what I like to listen to in exchange for help in
> > organizing my digital media library.  Not a good trade... unless of
> > course you are a willing consumer.
> >
> >
> > > iTunes convinced me to get an iPod. Which convinced me to splurge on
> > > an iPhone. Which has convinced me to make the big leap from Windows to
> > > Mac next time I need a computer (unless this supposed open source
> > > revolution happens sometime between now and then - which I don't put
> > > out of the realm of possibility).
> > True consumer.  Makes me sick.
> >
> > Newsflash!  Open source is already here for those of us who can follow
> > instructions in a readme file.
> >
> > > What I really want is a way to remotely access (and download, if not
> > > stream) my entire music collection from my phone. I know eMusic and
> > > others tried out this "digital locker" concept a few years back, but
> > > why has no one picked this back up? I guess it's more likely that some
> > > kind of all-music-ever-recorded-is-freely-available-on-the-internets
> > > solution will show up first. I guess we're already there is some ways.
> > Why?  How could you possibly listen to your entire music collection at
> > one time unless you have less than a few hours of music?  I don't
> > understand the reasons that compel people to want things that have
> > such overblown features which a person could not possibly use without
> > constantly wearing such a device.  This is similar to the hundreds of
> > channels of programming now available on subscription based TV.  Why
> > would anyone pay for all of those channels if they can never watch all
> > of the channels at once?  It is wasteful and indicative of a society
> > out of touch with a sustainable future.
> >
> > > On the topic of open source, have y'all seen this?http://ardour.org/
> > > Open source DAW, supposedly comparable to Nuendo, ProTools, et al. I
> > > PayPal-ed him some bucks. How cool that would be. I would love to run
> > > my studio on Linux using an open source DAW.
> > Lots of people are using open source Linux platforms for editing
> > audio.  The reason that most people don't know this is because they
> > live in a realm of conciousness where if it isn't recommended by a
> > friend or seen on TV or lodged in some other mainstream thought-
> > stream, they ignore it.
> >
> > One simply has to open their eyes and look.
> >
> > Now I am not saying that every person who fits the description above
> > is an idiot but it is fairly clear that this is the method of
> > operation for a lot of people in this country.  We seem to be lazy
> > (well some of us), so we must be spoon-fed new ideas and new
> > technologies through some mechanism other than our own thoughts and
> > curiosities.  I think that paradigm should be changed to benefit the
> > thinkers as opposed to the non-thinking hoards.  Technology used to be
> > a domain restricted to those who took the time to learn about the
> > technology.  Then along came MicroCrap and their ilk and decided to
> > make the PC an appliance that even an untrained human could operate
> > (well most of them anyway).  This lowest common denominator approach
> > has created a population of non-technical people using highly
> > technical machines... a formula destined to be remembered as
> > Machavellian genius.  As the average non-technical person becomes more
> > and more the description of people who use PCs and other computing
> > devices, the number of true techies who become millionaires increases.
> >
> > So to sum up, Bill Gates is a genius who made BILLIONS off of morons
> > who have no clue that they are morons.
> >
> > -- ch-scene: the list that mirrors alt.music.chapel-hill --
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/ch-scene
> -- ch-scene: the list that mirrors alt.music.chapel-hill --
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/ch-scene