Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-metadata - Re: How about a META tag?

cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
  • To: cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: How about a META tag?
  • Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 14:32:35 -0500

>>>>> "ML" == Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org> writes:

ML> However, I welcome further ideas and discussion...

My further idea would be that <meta> tags would work fine. I'd think
that it'd be relatively easy to include the Dublin Core metadata
encoding schema for HTML:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2731.txt

...and simply point the DC.Rights element at the appropriate license:

<meta name="DC.Rights"
lang="en"
content="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/"; />

This is, after all, a recommended use of Dublin Core. The specific
rights and prohibitions aren't encoded in the <meta> tags, but the
DCMI term "accessRights" seems appropriate:

http://www.dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/

And there's a Working Draft for Dublin Core for adding terms:

http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/

This is open for public comment right now; a statement from CC about
what we needed would probably go into the final recommendation.

Almost all browsers know not to render <link> + <meta> tags in-line
(I've never seen one that does, but I never question the stupidity of
browser developers), and some actually know what to do with them. They
don't have to be hidden in comments, or whatever.

~ESP

--
Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page