cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- From: "Jonathon Blake" <jonathon.blake AT gmail.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:27:31 +0000
Javier wrote:
¿Exactly how do you expect the novelists currently publishing under a
by-nc-sa license to make a living if they publish their work under by-sa?
In theory, the primary means of distribution of BY-NC-SA is gratis.
That won't generate any revenue for the author.
The secondary means of distribution, which will be non-gratis, will
not generate any revenue for the author.
but unfortunately there aren't many high-paying jobs for novelists.
"Exposure". This is more likely to happen with BY-SA than BY-NC-SA.
xan
jonathon
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
teun spaans, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Erik Moeller, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
rob, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Antoine, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
rob, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/21/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Javier Candeira, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Jonathon Blake, 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Mike Linksvayer, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
S. Massy, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Javier Candeira, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Jonathon Blake, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Javier Candeira, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
teun spaans, 03/08/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.