cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:41:05 -0500
On Thursday 08 March 2007 05:09 am, Antoine wrote:
>
> Note :
> The irony is where the word "commons" comes from:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commons
> The Wikipedia article does not mention any "non-commercial" limitation to
> the "number of traditional rights" which could be exercised by the
> commoners.
I would be interesting to see someone put together a history of "commons"
around the world in light of the modern libre and commons "movements"...
One thing I think I have picked up though is that not every member of the
public was a member of the commons... (Better language?)
So, you could possibly put together a "commons club" where the people in the
club had commons rights to the works and the people on the outside didn't..
and still be a commons in some historical contexts... Yes? No?
>
> cheers
>
> Antoine.
all the best,
drew
--
(da idea man)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Mike Linksvayer, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/09/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Mike Linksvayer, 03/09/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Luis Villa, 03/09/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/09/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Jonathon Blake, 03/12/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Erik Moeller, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Antoine, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
teun spaans, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Erik Moeller, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
rob, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Antoine, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
rob, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
teun spaans, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/21/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Javier Candeira, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Jonathon Blake, 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Mike Linksvayer, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
S. Massy, 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Jonathon Blake, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Javier Candeira, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Mike Linksvayer, 03/08/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.