cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- From: Javier Candeira <javier AT candeira.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:01:23 +1100
Kevin Phillips (home) wrote:
>> Writers do not really have such alternatives, as a body
>> of text is a body of text is body of test...
>
> Audio books are a good possibility, or other alternative ways to deliver the
> "text".
And as anyone can make an audiobook off a by-nc-sa novel, the only
difference with by-sa is that -nc only allows the novelist to sell the
audiobook.
>> Once you've read
>> something, you've read it; if it is very good, you might wish to read
>> it again, but are unlikely to wish to read it every day or hang it on
>> your wall.
>> S.M.
>
> ok. So you need to come to my house and explain to my fiancee why she
> doesn't actually need to buy all of Cory Doctorow's books because he has
> them online for free download. :) She loves books, likes to carry them
> around and read them on trains, swap them with friends. She's an active
> bookmoocher and doesn't seem to be so unique in this regard.
Market for novelists is a bit bigger when you not only consider the nutters.
> It's apparently also essential to have more than one version of a book,
> especially limited edition shiny covered highly-stroke'able expensive ones!
> :) ...prefereably signed...
Of course. And even translations into languages you don't understand. It's
the covers, you know? Still, we nutters ('us nutters'?) are a limited
market. Most readers pick up whatever cheap paperback edition.
-- j
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
rob, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Antoine, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/21/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Javier Candeira, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Jonathon Blake, 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Mike Linksvayer, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
S. Massy, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Javier Candeira, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Jonathon Blake, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Kevin Phillips (home), 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Javier Candeira, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
rob, 03/08/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.