cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- From: "Luis Villa" <luis AT tieguy.org>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:28:07 -0500
On 3/8/07, Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 09:05 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com> wrote:
> > > You could perhaps measure re-use of
> > > samples in ccmixter for a similar study?
> >
> > That's the sort of thing I'm looking for. Yes, ccMixter identifies
> > sources, doesn't it? I could select samples of works at random,
>
> Presumably CC could give you access to the database, and you could use
> all of them, not just a random sample.
Yes, CC would. This reminds me that we should add source info to the
atom dump. Probably not for a couple weeks.
ccMixter data is worth looking at, but skewed badly in at least two
ways:
* No by-sa present
Oh, doh.
* Whatever license used by the most popular contest source(s) will have
been re-used the most, regardless of its impact globally
I figured those would have to be filtered out.
Luis
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Antoine, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Terry Hancock, 03/09/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Luis Villa, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Lucas Gonze, 03/10/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Mike Linksvayer, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/09/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Mike Linksvayer, 03/09/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Luis Villa, 03/09/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/09/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Jonathon Blake, 03/12/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Erik Moeller, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Antoine, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
teun spaans, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Erik Moeller, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
rob, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Antoine, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
rob, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
teun spaans, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/08/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.