cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...

From: Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org>
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:30:30 +0000

On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 09:05 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com> wrote:
> > > You could perhaps measure re-use of
> > > samples in ccmixter for a similar study?
> >
> > That's the sort of thing I'm looking for. Yes, ccMixter identifies
> > sources, doesn't it? I could select samples of works at random,
>
> Presumably CC could give you access to the database, and you could use
> all of them, not just a random sample.

Yes, CC would. This reminds me that we should add source info to the
atom dump. Probably not for a couple weeks.

ccMixter data is worth looking at, but skewed badly in at least two
ways:
* No by-sa present
* Whatever license used by the most popular contest source(s) will have
been re-used the most, regardless of its impact globally

--
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:Mike_Linksvayer

Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it... , (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Erik Moeller, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Antoine, 03/08/2007
  - Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., teun spaans, 03/08/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Erik Moeller, 03/08/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
  - Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007