cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- From: Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:32:18 -0600
Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 09:05 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
>>Presumably CC could give you access to the database, and you could use
>>all of them, not just a random sample.
>
> Yes, CC would.
I'm going to have to take you up on that. We might need to talk about
formats, etc. offlist (I'd want to get it into SQL, I think. But even
CSV would do. What's the existing backend database?).
> ccMixter data is worth looking at, but skewed badly in at least two
> ways:
> * No by-sa present
Definitely a problem from my PoV.
> * Whatever license used by the most popular contest source(s) will have
> been re-used the most, regardless of its impact globally
I don't use ccMixter much myself -- are you saying that much of the
content results from periodic contests?
Even so, though, I think it would be interesting to do a study on the
fates of works under different licenses. I could certainly write a
script to do this kind of study.
One thing that concerns me a little is the distinction between mixing
"tracks" (e.g. syncing music to an a capella song track) and mixing
"samples" (e.g. constructing music from samples). Those are different in
their legal consequences, if I understand correctly (the latter is
allowed by Sampling, but the former, not, I would think).
Cheers,
Terry
--
Terry Hancock (hancock AT AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/13/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., S. Massy, 03/15/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Antoine, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Terry Hancock, 03/09/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Luis Villa, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Lucas Gonze, 03/10/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Mike Linksvayer, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/09/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Mike Linksvayer, 03/09/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Luis Villa, 03/09/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/09/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Jonathon Blake, 03/12/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Erik Moeller, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Antoine, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
teun spaans, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., Erik Moeller, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
drew Roberts, 03/08/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it..., rob, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
teun spaans, 03/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...,
Terry Hancock, 03/13/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.