cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA CompatibilityLanguageToo

From: tomislav medak <to-me AT mi2.hr>
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA CompatibilityLanguageToo
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 03:00:57 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

drew Roberts wrote:

> No, not really unless I missed something. What is called for is a meta
> button
> that would to me cover BY and BY-SA licenses. It would be nice if some
> support "areas" were set up by CC for this as well. A Free CC list, etc.

What would be the benefit of such a meta button? It would again conflate
different licenses. There was once however the talk of using additional
color-coding for different degrees of freedom similar licenses offer,
where BY and BY-SA licenses had the same coloring. However, this really
is a minor issue.

It rather seems that what you're pushing for is a definition of 'free',
maybe something along the line of push to define 'the standard of
freedom(s)', which some people here on the list are advocating?

Tom

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF0RvZkbN024ZV0z0RAhxAAJ4qizJ+3xvbCbH4OpEglchjp7U2ewCdGEQx
WuCfJ0wAkOF4enJNiCv2Sl4=
=IUDQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too , (continued)