cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
[cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution.
- From: "Greg London" <email AT greglondon.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution.
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 21:55:03 -0500 (EST)
There is a business model in the GNU-GPL community
where people take a work and release it under the
GNU-GPL license. They (or a small group) do the
entire application code. They do not accept outside
contributions. They then license their work under
GNU-GPL.
And then they make their money by selling proprietary
licenses to that very same code.
For those of you who are willing to allow someone
a commercial monopoly on some particular platform,
I suggest that you take your content and do like
the dual-licensers do. License your work CC-SA
and contribute it to some larger community, and
then when some proprietary company wants the exclusive
rights to use that content on their DRM-Only hardware
platform, dual license your content. Give the proprietary
vendor a CC-BY license to use your work on their
platform, let them have sole right to commercial advantage
on that platform, and everyone should be happy.
Oh, wait, you want EVERYONE to sign their rights
away to this proprietary vendor????
I think I see the problem....
-
Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject)
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), rob, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Alek Tarkowski, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Bjorn Wijers, 12/05/2006
- [cc-licenses] Discussion, Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- [cc-licenses] ParDist does not address commercial monopoly, Greg London, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] ParDist does not address commercial monopoly, Greg London, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), James Grimmelmann, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), rob, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., Greg London, 12/04/2006
- [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, James Grimmelmann, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, drew Roberts, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, Mia Garlick, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, drew Roberts, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., James Grimmelmann, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.