cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Greg London" <email AT greglondon.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:57:32 -0400 (EDT)
> Having CCPL-licensed works in Debian
> would be a very good thing for both projects.
For some definitions of "very good".
See previous security flaws.
The odd question I'm left with is whether
or not CC would be compatible with Debian
if CC actually protected the projects that
used CC licenses from DRM vulnerabilities,
while Debian didnt.
Does Debian require this vulnerability
be in the license? Or could the vulnerabilty
be fixed and the resulting license be
Debian compatible?
--
Wikipedia and the Great Sneetches War
http://www.somerightsreserved.org
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Mike Linksvayer, 08/09/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/10/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Mike Linksvayer, 08/10/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/10/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Paul Keller, 08/10/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Mia Garlick, 08/10/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Evan Prodromou, 08/10/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Evan Prodromou, 08/10/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/12/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Greg London, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Greg London, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Mike Linksvayer, 08/13/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Terry Hancock, 08/13/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion, Greg London, 08/14/2006
- [cc-licenses] CC 3 and Circumvention [Was Re: Version 3.0 - Public Discussion], Rob Myers, 08/14/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC 3 and Circumvention [Was Re: Version 3.0 - Public Discussion], Greg London, 08/14/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC 3 and Circumvention [Was Re: Version 3.0 - Public Discussion], rob, 08/15/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC 3 and Circumvention [Was Re: Version 3.0 - Public Discussion], Peter Brink, 08/15/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC 3 and Circumvention [Was Re: Version 3.0 - Public Discussion], Greg London, 08/15/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CC 3 and Circumvention [Was Re: Version 3.0 - Public Discussion], Peter Brink, 08/15/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Mike Linksvayer, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Greg London, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Evan Prodromou, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Greg London, 08/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion,
Mike Linksvayer, 08/09/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.