Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Greg London" <email AT greglondon.com>
  • To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Public Discussion
  • Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:57:32 -0400 (EDT)


> Having CCPL-licensed works in Debian
> would be a very good thing for both projects.

For some definitions of "very good".
See previous security flaws.

The odd question I'm left with is whether
or not CC would be compatible with Debian
if CC actually protected the projects that
used CC licenses from DRM vulnerabilities,
while Debian didnt.

Does Debian require this vulnerability
be in the license? Or could the vulnerabilty
be fixed and the resulting license be
Debian compatible?

--
Wikipedia and the Great Sneetches War
http://www.somerightsreserved.org





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page