cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Public Domain dedication
- Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:12:05 +0000
On 26 Mar 2005, at 02:34, drew Roberts wrote:
On Friday 25 March 2005 08:00 pm, Gottfried Hofmann wrote:
Do you need to claim copyright in order to relicense something in the
Public Domain?
Don't you mean to ask something like:
Do you need to claim authorship in order to relicense and claim copyright to
something in the public domain?
You get copyright in anything you write automatically, so you don't have to claim it in order to have it.
Since you get it automatically you do have to make an effort to dedicate it to the public domain. I'm sure I've heard that there are some jurisdictions where copyright is inalienable so you can't do this. I don't remember where though. I think it might have been somewhere in Scandinavia.
Going the opposite way, you cannot just claim copyright on something that is public domain, unless that silly re-broadcasting law has been passed in the US.
You can claim copyright on something that features public domain work, either deriving from it or including it. PD is not viral. But I don't know what the threshold is for this.
Of course you cannot claim that you wrote Shakespear, but can't you
print and sell a Book of Shakespear and mark it "All Rights Reserved"?
People seem to do things like this all the time. Still:
You cannot legally do this. In the US it's actually an offence to do so, I'm told.
I think they were talking about the need to
have some (significant?) amount of input or change before you could
claim a copyright in a PD work.
So, perhaps they are claiming copyright in the layout, typography, selection
of works and order of works chosen. Illustrations? I don't know. But I do
remember reading something like I said recently. I don't know if it is
correct, and if it is if it applies everywhere.
You would need to claim copyright on either the typographic arrangement or, if you add or combine stuff, the aggregate work. Dover and clip art publishers do the aggregate thing, I'm guessing Shakespeare republishers do the typography thing.
- Rob.
-
Re: Public Domain dedication
, (continued)
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Daniel Carrera, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, drew Roberts, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Mike Linksvayer, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Greg London, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Mike Linksvayer, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, LinuxLala, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Greg London, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, drew Roberts, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Gottfried Hofmann, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, drew Roberts, 03/25/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Rob Myers, 03/26/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Branko Collin, 03/26/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, drew Roberts, 03/26/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Henri Sivonen, 03/27/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, drew Roberts, 03/27/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Henri Sivonen, 03/27/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, drew Roberts, 03/27/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Henri Sivonen, 03/28/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, Branko Collin, 03/27/2005
- Re: Public Domain dedication, drew Roberts, 03/27/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/25/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.