Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: Public Domain dedication

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Daniel Carrera <dcarrera AT math.umd.edu>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: Public Domain dedication
  • Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:41:23 -0500

Greg London wrote:

> > PD is not a license. It means that you give up all rights to the work
> > until the end of time.
>
> I swear I read somewhere that you cannot NOT get the rights to your work
> since copyright is automatic.
>
> So, if you write something, copyright is automatically assigned to you,
> and that the only way to give them up was to license them away.

Yes and no. Copyright *is* automatic. But you are still allowed to
transfer your copyright, or give it up entirely. A lot of companies
require you to do that exactly (assign the copyright to them). This is
also common in Free/Open Source Projects. The Free Software Foundation
requires copyright assignment for all GNU software, Novell requires
assignment for Mono, the Apache Foundation does too, as does Sun
Microsystems for OpenOffice.org. Well, in that last instance, Sun only
requires a "joint" copyright. So you both have the copyright to the work.

In any event, you can also forfeit copyright entirely. This is what we
call Public Domain.

Now, copyright is automatic, indeed. So you have to take extra action to
either transfer it or forgeit it. If you do nothing, you keep it.


> > May I ask, what is the work in question?
> > Maybe I can offer an opinion on which is better.
>
> Well, it's either be a complete piece of crap that no one will read,
> or it will be something that puts IP law into a historical perspective
> the makes it plainly obvious to the average citizen just how out of
> whack things have gotten and causes a complete reform of IP law in the US.

I don't see any need, or benefit, in that being in the Public Domain.
I think I'd recommend the CC-BY license.

If it were, for example, photos, clipart or sounds, I would have
recommended Public Domain.

Cheers,
--
Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org |




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page