cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Branko Collin" <collin AT xs4all.nl>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: "Creative Commons in the News"
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:46:31 +0100
On 18 Mar 2005, at 8:18, Sigmascape1 AT cs.com wrote:
> I'd love to see some kind of website that could explain, in basic
> terms, what the copyright law is all about. Yes, I realize that
> various websites already exist that may satisfy this request, but I
> think the site also needs to address why culture is impacted by
> extreme durations of copyright protection. Also, without question, the
> public domain (the commons) needs to be addressed and explained on a
> level that anyone can understand.
In other words, you want your copyright explanation from a certain
point of view. I think that is the only way it would work, but: I
think that Creative Commons needs to explain copyright from its point
of view.
Although the extreme duration of copyright is related to Creative
Commons (it's his perceived shrinking of the public domain that made
Larry Lessig start CC, IIRC), I am not sure that is the aspect of
copyright that should be highlighted for the benefit of someone
wishing to choose a license.
As it is, a lot of people understand little to nothing about
copyright law.
When some ten years ago the internet started to get popular, the
prevailing notion seemed to be that everything on the internet was
that everything there was for the taking: once something landed on
the internet, it was considered free.
These were the days when Brad Templeton wrote his "10 Big Myths about
copyright explained"
(<http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>). At the time, the
document seemed to make a lot of sense. The if-it's-on-the-net-it's-
free brigade affected everybody. If you had made a cool site,
somebody was sure to come along, copy it wholesale and claim it as
his. Much easier to take that person to task over copyright than over
ethics.
Nowadays, when actual people are actually getting harased by lawyers,
Brad's document suddenly seems to be decidedly on the side of strong
copyright. There is no equivalent document about Fair Use, the Public
Domain, and making your downloaders feel less like criminals.
Although that document also needs to be written, I feel CC should
focus on the commons.
--
branko collin
collin AT xs4all.nl
-
"Creative Commons in the News",
Branko Collin, 03/16/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Greg London, 03/16/2005
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", drew Roberts, 03/16/2005
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", Branko Collin, 03/16/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", fwilf, 03/16/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Sigmascape1, 03/16/2005
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", drew Roberts, 03/16/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Sigmascape1, 03/18/2005
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", Branko Collin, 03/18/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Sigmascape1, 03/18/2005
-
CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Knupfer, H-Net, 03/18/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Daniel Carrera, 03/18/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/18/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Rob Myers, 03/19/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Knupfer, H-Net, 03/24/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Brink, 03/24/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Robin Millette, 03/24/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/24/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/24/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Robin Millette, 03/24/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Brink, 03/24/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Knupfer, H-Net, 03/24/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Daniel Carrera, 03/18/2005
-
CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Knupfer, H-Net, 03/18/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Greg London, 03/16/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.