cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Sigmascape1 AT cs.com
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: "Creative Commons in the News"
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:06:12 -0500
Sad but true. The general public simply doesn't understand copyright laws,
and I am not talking about in-depth knowledge. I am talking about basic
stuff. In some ways, I can attribute this general lack of knowlegge to simply
not caring. It's kind of like people not caring that when they go to a
computer store (your average Circuit City/Best Buy/Office Depot), they only
have one option in operating systems. No alarms go off in their heads, no
panic, no questioning why this is the ways things are. It's apathy like this
that is keeping laws like the DMCA alive and well.
I have to say that Professor Lessig, and a few others, are helping to
redefine what some may see as copyrights and the alternatives, but more needs
to be done. It is sad that the American people (and the world at large) are
being force-fed laws that extend the length of copyrights, tighten the grip
of copyright holders and hold back intellectual advancements all because of
bad policy-making.
What do you guys think? Am I right that more education for the general public
is needed?
Thanks,
Mitch
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:01:13 -0500 (EST)
>From: "Greg London" <email AT greglondon.com>
>Subject: Re: "Creative Commons in the News"
>To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts"
> <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
>Message-ID: <35691.206.67.17.2.1110985273.squirrel AT webmail4.pair.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
>Branko Collin said:
>> "Creative Commons in the News"
>> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/15/2145245
>
>Wow. I read some of the replies further down and it
>is clear to me that people just don't get copyright.
>Even basic, all rights reserved, copyright, let alone
>spectrum of rights copyright.
>
>palmpilot->todolist->"educate planet about copyright"
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
-
"Creative Commons in the News",
Branko Collin, 03/16/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Greg London, 03/16/2005
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", drew Roberts, 03/16/2005
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", Branko Collin, 03/16/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", fwilf, 03/16/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Sigmascape1, 03/16/2005
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", drew Roberts, 03/16/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Sigmascape1, 03/18/2005
- Re: "Creative Commons in the News", Branko Collin, 03/18/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Sigmascape1, 03/18/2005
-
CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Knupfer, H-Net, 03/18/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Daniel Carrera, 03/18/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", drew Roberts, 03/18/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Rob Myers, 03/19/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Knupfer, H-Net, 03/24/2005
- Re: CC licenses and "moral rights", Peter Brink, 03/24/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Knupfer, H-Net, 03/24/2005
-
Re: CC licenses and "moral rights",
Daniel Carrera, 03/18/2005
-
CC licenses and "moral rights",
Peter Knupfer, H-Net, 03/18/2005
-
Re: "Creative Commons in the News",
Greg London, 03/16/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.