development of an education license or license option for Creative Commons

[David Wiley <dw2 AT opencontent.org>]

email AT greglondon.com wrote:
> Agreed. but education-only licenses should not be
> on a CreativeCommons.org website, talking about
> creating a public commons of audio, video, and text,
> with a picture of a cow eating in a public commons
> as its mascot.
>  
> If it ain't a commons, it shouldn't be on this website
> or it should be clearly delineated with a message:
> "This license will not put your work in a public commons"

Isn't this for Creative Commons to decide? I know that sounds like a 
silly question, but shouldn't they be allowed to judge for themselves 
what is a commons and what isn't, and whether an educational commons is 
a thing worth trying to facilitate or not?

D