cc-education AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: development of an education license or license option for Creative Commons
List archive
- From: "Alexander, Bryan" <balexan AT middlebury.edu>
- To: 'development of an education license or license option for Creative Commons' <cc-education AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:18:51 -0500
Many college faculty have the sense of copyright as something external to
them. An edu license could bring it home, as it were.
Bryan Alexander
Center for Educational Technology
http://cet.middlebury.edu/bryan
ICQ: 23090001
AIM: "DoctorNemoBryan"
Windows Messenger: balexan AT middlebury.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: Zachary Chandler [mailto:zechandl AT colby.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 12:45 PM
To: development of an education license or license option for Creative
Commons
Subject: Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?
Quoting email AT greglondon.com:
> Can someone explain WHY an Education-Only
> license needs to exist?
>
> What benefits would an education-only license
> have that would compensate for the advantages
> LOST from not using a much more public CC-BY-SA.
For my part, it's the promotional power of the EDU stamp, getting more
people on board. I guess what we have to decide if that's important enough
to warrant a degradation of the open content principle. Though I respect the
alternative, I lean in favor of the edu license especially the new draft
option -- but then again I work for a college.
-Zach
==================================
Zachary Chandler
Language Technology Consultant
Director, Language Resource Center
Colby College
Waterville, Maine 04901
http://www.colby.edu/lrc/
zechandl AT colby.edu
207.872.3898
_______________________________________________
cc-education mailing list
cc-education AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-education
-
[cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
email, 02/09/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Zachary Chandler, 02/09/2004
- Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, Heather Ford, 02/09/2004
- Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, Wouter Vanden Hove, 02/09/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, Alexander, Bryan, 02/09/2004
-
RE: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
email, 02/09/2004
- RE: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, David Palmer, 02/09/2004
- Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, David Wiley, 02/10/2004
-
RE: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
email, 02/09/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
David Wiley, 02/09/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Stephen Downes, 02/10/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Heather Ford, 02/10/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Stephen Downes, 02/10/2004
-
[cc-education] Moving ahead,
David Wiley, 02/11/2004
- Re: [cc-education] Moving ahead, Stephen Downes, 02/11/2004
-
[cc-education] Moving ahead,
David Wiley, 02/11/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Stephen Downes, 02/10/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Heather Ford, 02/10/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Stephen Downes, 02/10/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
David Wiley, 02/09/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Zachary Chandler, 02/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.